post-autistic economics review
Issue no. 30, 21 March 2005

 

 

      issue 23 contents                            PAE Review index                               home page

 

 

 

Editor’s Note

Gossip: PAE and the economics textbook industry



Recent conversation and correspondence with the head commissioning editors at three of the world’s largest publishers of English-language economics textbooks reveal that they anticipate the need to make fundamental changes in their product lines as a result of the PAE movement.  The growing view in the industry is that the nature of demand in the economics textbook market is changing, especially for entry level textbooks.


One editor reports that his firm is planning a book for the first-year principles market with characteristics I would ascribe to a pluralistic approach . .  such as a rejection of rote rehearsal of neo-classical theory just because that is always how it’s been done, and a recognition that books must relate theory to the real-world and capture the imagination of students.”


Another publisher who is already about to go to press with an explicitly pluralistic textbook for business economics, is actively seeking an author or authors for a new first-year principles textbook constructed on pluralist lines.  “What we want”, explained the editor, “is a text that begins with neoclassical economics, maybe the first two or three chapters, and then quickly moves on to introduce the student to other approaches.”


It takes on average three years for a publisher to bring a new major economics textbook onto the market and then at least a second edition before it can hope to capture a significant market share.  Commissioning editors are now doubly nervous about the future of this market.  Economics textbooks have long been a big earner for these publishers, but now are increasingly less so as enrolments for undergraduate economics courses continue to fall.  But there is also PAE and the perceived movement away from the neoclassical hegemony.  Commissioning editors appear to regard this as the joker in the pack.  It could save them or ruin them.  If PAE inspired textbooks were widely adopted in universities it could bring back the students and raise textbook sales to previous or even higher levels.  But if a textbook publisher holds back now from investing in pluralist and reality-based textbooks, it could find itself, as one editor put it, “without a product to sell” in a new market situation.  The market for PAE textbooks may currently be small,  but editors are mindful of the possibility that the movement away from neoclassical economics could at some point accelerate dramatically, especially as economics teachers scramble to save their jobs.